ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Dapagliflozin and cognitive impairment: pharmacological mechanisms, translational evidence, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive impairment increasingly emerges at the intersection of type 2 diabetes mellitus, vascular brain injury, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and neurodegeneration, prompting interest in therapies that modify shared metabolic and inflammatory drivers of brain vulnerability. Dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor widely used in type 2 diabetes and cardiorenal disease, has attracted attention as a candidate modulator of cognitive decline because its established peripheral pharmacology extends beyond glucose lowering to include natriuresis, blood pressure reduction, weight loss, improved insulin resistance, reduced oxidative and inflammatory stress, and favorable cardiorenal effects. In this review, we examine the pharmacological basis by which these systemic actions could influence the neurovascular unit, mitochondrial homeostasis, glial activation, autophagy-related signaling, and synaptic plasticity pathways implicated in cognitive impairment. We summarize preclinical evidence suggesting that dapagliflozin can improve cognitive performance and modulate pathways such as AMPK-mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin, CREB/BDNF, oxidative stress responses, and neuroinflammatory signaling in experimental models, while also critically evaluating the limitations of these models. We then assess the current human evidence, distinguishing observational studies that suggest lower dementia risk from randomized clinical evidence that has not yet established a definitive cognition-related benefit. We argue that dapagliflozin should currently be viewed not as a proven cognitive therapeutic, but as a mechanistically plausible metabolic-neurovascular intervention whose relevance may be greatest in metabolically vulnerable phenotypes. Finally, we outline key translational challenges, including uncertainty regarding direct central target engagement, the need for biomarker-enriched trial designs, and the importance of integrating pharmacological, vascular, and neurodegenerative frameworks in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.