ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Caregiver activation: a concept analysis.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As health care shifts toward person-centred models, informal family caregivers increasingly manage complex, long-term conditions. However, caregiver activation has been applied across oncology, dementia, paediatric, and chronic care settings without consensus regarding its definition or core components. Objective: To clarify the concept of caregiver activation by systematically analysing its defining attributes, antecedents, and consequences, and to provide a practical framework for identifying caregivers who may benefit from tailored support to enhance engagement and improve care-recipient outcomes. Information sources: Eleven databases were searched from inception to October 2025, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid, the Cochrane Library, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, the Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, the Chinese Medical Database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Dictionaries, including the Cambridge Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, the Collins English Dictionary, and the Modern Chinese Dictionary, were also consulted. Methods: Walker and Avant's eight-step concept analysis guided the study. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, and disagreements were resolved through discussion with a third investigator. Results: A total of 19,572 records were retrieved, of which 51 studies were ultimately included. Caregiver activation comprised four interrelated attributes: care capabilities, care autonomy, care resilience, and self-efficacy in care provision. Key antecedents included care-recipient dependency, caregiver-clinician collaboration, insufficient caregiving proficiency, and caregiver burden. Higher caregiver activation was associated with improved health service utilization, enhanced caregiver well-being, and better care management practices. Conclusions: Caregiver activation is a multidimensional and dynamic process that is central to optimizing outcomes for both caregivers and care recipients. The clarified framework may support identification of caregivers who could benefit from targeted education and tailored services, and may inform development of digital health tools and broader strategies to strengthen caregiver engagement and care-recipient outcomes. Registration: Not registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.