ArticleBJUI compass2026
Single-layer versus double-layer suture during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumours in close proximity to the collecting system or renal sinus: A propensity-matched analysis.
Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compares perioperative outcomes of single-layer suture (SLS) and double-layer suture (DLS) technique for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in patients with renal tumours in close proximity to the collecting system or renal sinus. Patients and Methods: A total of 178 patients with renal tumours adjacent to the collecting system or renal sinus were identified from the databases of our institution who underwent LPN between November 2020 and December 2023. SLS ( Results: In all, 76 patients could be matched in each group. Compared with DLS, SLS significantly reduced the warm ischaemia time (22.45 ± 7.75 vs. 28.87 ± 7.77 min, Conclusion: SLS during LPN offers effective renorrhaphy, reducing the warm ischaemia time without increasing the risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.