ArticleReproductive medicine and biology
Age-Specific Gonadotoxic Alkylating-Agent Exposure in Pediatric and Reproductive-Age Females: A Claims-Based Study Using Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose.
Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To describe age-specific patterns of gonadotoxic alkylating-agent exposure and evaluate how the cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED) framework captures real-world exposure relevant to fertility preservation in females aged 0-43 years. Methods: This descriptive study used a Japanese claims database. Patients were classified as pediatric (< 15 years) or reproductive-age (15-43 years). Twelve alkylating agents were evaluated, and six CED-calculable agents were converted to CED. Results: Among approximately 3.86 million females, 0.04% of the pediatric cohort and 0.16% of the reproductive-age cohort were exposed to at least one alkylating agent. Total CED identified at least intermediate-risk exposure in 33% of exposed pediatric and 14% of exposed reproductive-age patients. Compared with single-agent assessment, summed total CED identified additional patients mainly in the pediatric group, corresponding to relative increases of 20.2% and 0.3%, respectively. Agents not included in the current CED formula accounted for 8.7% of all alkylating-agent prescription records, approximately 90% of which were observed in reproductive-age patients. Conclusions: CED captured alkylating-agent exposure differently by age group: summed CED added exposure information mainly in pediatric patients, whereas agents lacking conversion coefficients limited exposure capture in reproductive-age females. These findings support refinement of CED-based assessment while emphasizing exposure capture, not outcome prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.