Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548815›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Mucosal immune cell priming by intranasally delivered

Jack S Pepper, Caitlyn M Granland, Sharon L Clark, Ruth B Thornton, Josephine Bayliss, M Z Edison Foo, Wesley Billingham, Naomi Scott, Alma Fulurija, Deborah H Strickland and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jack S PepperWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Caitlyn M GranlandWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Sharon L ClarkWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Ruth B ThorntonWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Josephine BaylissWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
M Z Edison FooWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Wesley BillinghamBiostatistics, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Naomi ScottWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Alma FulurijaWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Deborah H StricklandWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Selma P WiertsemaBioscienceConnect, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Peter C RichmondWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Elke J SeppanenWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Lea-Ann S KirkhamWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
M Christian TjiamWesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, The Kids Research Institute Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Intranasal vaccines offer a needle-free strategy to enhance immunity to respiratory infections. We investigated the mechanism of action of a novel intranasal vaccine using the human respiratory commensal Methods: Mucosal and systemic cellular immune responses were assessed 2-144 hours after intranasal Hh treatment in mice, compared with placebo or the Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)2-6 agonist Pam2CSK4 using spectral flow cytometry. The impact of treatment on subsequent IAV and NTHi challenge was also evaluated. Results: Hh induced a distinct, tissue-specific immune signature with rapid recruitment of neutrophils and inflammatory monocytes to the lungs, peaking at 6 hours, earlier than Pam2CSK4. Hh also generated higher proportions of nasal CD103 Discussion: These findings demonstrate that Hh primes mucosal immune responses to promote heterologous protection.

Indexed as

Haemophilus InfectionsHaemophilus influenzaeHaemophilus VaccinesImmunity, MucosalInfluenza A virusOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsFemaleHumansMiceHaemophilus Vaccinesimmune priminginfluenza Aintranasal vaccinationlungsnasal tissueotitis media

Identifiers

PMID42548815
PMCPMC13429789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.