Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548800›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Novel nested conformal prediction analysis to unravel complexity in patient subtyping.

Linda Maldera, Marco Masseroli, Silvia Cascianelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linda MalderaPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingengeria, Milan, Italy.
Marco MasseroliPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingengeria, Milan, Italy.
Silvia CascianelliPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingengeria, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient subtyping is significantly challenged by intra-sample heterogeneity, which limits the effectiveness of traditional multi-class classification approaches enforcing mutually exclusive labels. Despite recent promising results in the transition from multi-class to multi-label classification, this process is not straightforward and proves hard to systemize, especially when working with datasets of small dimensions. Here, we design a novel approach, implemented in a computational framework, leveraging machine learning models and an original nested conformal prediction strategy for small datasets to enable a rigorous transition to multi-label classification. Conformal prediction can indeed offer a statistically sound approach for robust subtype predictions; yet, so far, it has been limited to be exploited only in large datasets, not often available in real biomedical scenarios. We evaluate our approach using breast cancer patient RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, with subtypes originally defined via the PAM50 classifier. From a methodological standpoint, our innovative nested strategy enables the successful application of conformal prediction, which commonly requires large datasets, to a relatively small sample size. Specifically, conformal prediction is adapted and applied both to the reference PAM50 classification and to multiple machine learning models to test coherence and compare the obtained multi-label predictions. Our results reveal subtype- and sample-specific complexity and highlight consistent patterns of ambiguity across models. Importantly, we distinguish between robust, inherently heterogeneous, and weak assignments, providing deeper insight into clear subtype confirmations and complexity, but also critical incoherent predictions. Thus, overall, this work demonstrates the utility of our framework for uncertainty-aware sample subtyping, particularly in small and highly unbalanced sample settings.

Indexed as

cancerconformal predictionmachine learningmulti-label classificationpatient subtyping

Identifiers

PMID42548800
PMCPMC13429844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.