ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Effects of Timing of Microbial Exposure on Microbiome Assembly and Amphibian Immune Development.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Critical periods of development are time points that are especially sensitive to disruptions. Critical periods are important for microbiome assembly and the development of an effective immune system and, therefore, can have large and lasting impacts on host health, even through later life stages. Here, we investigated how a disruption to the microbiome of amphibians (treatment with a cocktail of six antibiotics and one antifungal compound) during early life and subsequent introduction to microbes at different developmental stages influences microbiome assembly and the development of the immune system (lymphoid tissues thymus and spleen). We found that antimicrobial treatments and introduction to microbes altered microbiome assembly (total microbial richness, antifungal microbial richness, composition, and relative abundances) and these changes were dependent on the timing of microbial introduction. Tadpoles treated with antimicrobials and then introduced to microbes at different developmental stages also had higher scaled abundances of bacteria in the phylum Actinobacteriota. However, after 7.5 weeks of tadpole development, we found no effects of treatment on lymphoid organ (thymus and spleen) size or on lymphoid cell counts. Overall, these results suggest that a disruption to the microbiome during early development, and more specifically, the length of the disruption and timing of reintroduction to microbes, can have significant impacts on microbiome assembly, potentially leading to long term impacts on host health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.