ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Patient journey mapping in an open-door psychiatric inpatient unit.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Open-door policies in inpatient psychiatric care have been increasingly adopted to enhance patient autonomy and reduce coercive practices. However, systematic methods for evaluating patient experiences in these settings remain limited. This study applied Patient Journey Mapping in an acute psychiatric unit operating a structured, time-limited (6 hours/day) open-door policy to comprehensively analyze the hospitalization experience. Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was used. Qualitative data were first collected through focus groups with patients (n = 18), following GRAMMS guidelines, to identify critical touchpoints across the hospitalization journey. Quantitative data were then collected from patients (n = 32) using an adapted Likert-type ordinal scale to assess satisfaction with the identified touchpoints. Data were analyzed using content analysis methods. Results: The analysis delineated the main phases of hospitalization and identified key experiential touchpoints, including "Moments of Truth," "Moments of Pain," and "Wow Moments," which substantially shaped patients' perceptions of care quality. Open-door policies were perceived as supporting autonomy and reducing psychological distress. However, several challenges remained, particularly regarding the admission process, privacy during medication administration, and communication about structured activities. Conclusion: Patient Journey Mapping provides a useful patient-centered approach for evaluating experiences in open-door psychiatric inpatient settings. The findings highlight opportunities to optimize service delivery, strengthen therapeutic environments, and support recovery-oriented practices in acute psychiatric care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.