Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548708›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Effects of long-term care insurance on women's time allocation: evidence from pilot regions in China.

Lin Wei, Ying Liu, Linping Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lin WeiCollege of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Ying LiuCollege of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Linping WangCollege of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As population aging intensifies in China, the demand for long-term care continues to rise, posing challenges to the sustainability of the traditional family-based care model. As important providers of family care, women often face a trade-off between caregiving responsibilities and personal development. In this context, long-term care insurance (LTCI) may support family caregiving and affect women's time allocation. Methods: Using data from the 2016 and 2018 waves of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), this study examines changes in women's time allocation associated with LTCI pilot policy exposure. The final analytical sample includes 11,475 female observations, with 1,426 in the treatment group and 10,049 in the control group. The study combines propensity score matching with a before-and-after comparison between pilot and non-pilot regions. Results: The study finds that LTCI pilot policy exposure is significantly associated with increased market labor time and leisure time and reduced household labor time among women. These associations vary across regions, age groups, and income groups. The mechanism analysis suggests that caregiving burden and upward financial support may serve as potential channels. Further analysis suggests that LTCI pilot policy exposure may be associated with improved intergenerational emotional bonds through increased leisure time. Discussion: This study provides empirical evidence for improving the LTCI system and enhancing women's well-being.

Indexed as

CaregiversInsurance, Long-Term CareAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot Projectshousehold laborleisurelong-term care insurancemarket laborwomen’s welfare

Identifiers

PMID42548708
PMCPMC13429663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.