ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Ideomotor representation, motor control, and body aesthetics in juvenile rhythmic gymnasts: between reciprocal support and differentiated trajectories within a personalized training program.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a personalized integrative training program on ideomotor representation, motor control estimated through whole-routine performance, and body aesthetics in juvenile rhythmic gymnasts, as well as to examine short-term transfer to competitive performance. Methods: The study used a pre-post intervention design and included 9 competitive rhythmic gymnasts aged 8-11 years who followed, for 14 weeks, a program integrated into their regular training. The assessment included whole-routine performance, used as an operational expression of motor control, computerized video analysis, the Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3), and the Evaluation of Body Aesthetics in Sports (EBAS). Results: All athletes showed increases in total whole-routine score, with the group mean rising from 16.06 ± 1.10 to 17.26 ± 1.00 points, while the mean difficulty realization rate increased from 64.66% to 72.82%. At the inferential level, ideomotor representation was the only variable that showed a statistically significant change between T0 and T2 (Z = -2.25, Conclusion: Ideomotor representation was the dimension most responsive to the intervention and may provide a useful reference point for optimizing performance organization in juvenile rhythmic gymnasts, even though the relationships among ideomotor representation, motor control, and body aesthetics remain unevenly consolidated in the short term and transfer to competitive performance is expressed differentially.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.