ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The impact of learn, exercise, and game structured curriculum model on physical activity in children aged 3-6 years.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the impact of the LEG structured curriculum model on physical activity among children aged 3-6 years, thereby enhancing their levels of MVPA, TPA, and reducing SB. Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a repeated-measurements approach to implement a physical activity intervention for preschool children, with the aim of assessing their outdoor physical activity (OPA) and structured physical activity (SPA). Using a combination of random cluster sampling and stratified sampling, 180 preschool children aged 3-6 were selected as study participants. An Actigraph GT3X accelerometer was used to measure the children's physical activity levels in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the program, and statistical analysis of the experimental data was conducted using an independent samples Results: In structured physical activities, both MVPA and TPA levels significantly increased among 3-6-year-old children in the experimental group. Among the 3-4-year-old children in the experimental group, MVPA increased by 68.5% at 6 weeks compared to baseline (8.14 vs. 4.83 min), but this increase had declined to 39.1% by 12 weeks. TPA also increased by 39% at 6 weeks (14.56 vs. 10.47 min), but by 12 weeks, the increase was only 7.6%, and exhibited a pattern of easy to initiate but difficult to sustain. For 4-5-year-old children in the experimental group, MVPA increased by 139.7% from week 0 to week 6 (12.78 vs. 5.33 min) and by an additional 30.1% by week 12. TPA increased by 84.5% at week 6 (21.14 vs. 11.46 min) and remained at a similar level at week 12, showed the most optimal intervention outcomes, with a linear increase. For 5-6-year-olds in the experimental group, MVPA increased by only 13.1% from baseline to week 6 (3.98 vs. 3.52 min), but surged by 251% by week 12 compared to week 6 (13.93 min). TPA also saw a significant increase by week 12 (a 140% increase compared to week 6), and influenced by factors such as class size and the children's desire for autonomy. Conclusion: The LEG structured curriculum model is most effective and suitable for improving sedentary behavior and increasing physical activity levels among 4-5-year-old children. It also yields significant results for 3-4-year-olds and 5-6-year-olds; but the intervention strategies still need to be further optimized to enhance their sustainability and overall effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.