ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Long-term impact of anastomotic leakage following esophageal atresia repair: feeding outcomes, esophageal morbidity, and reinterventions.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Anastomotic leakage remains one of the most common complications after esophageal atresia (EA) repair. However, its impact on long-term esophageal morbidity and functional outcomes remains incompletely understood. This study evaluated the clinical consequences of postoperative anastomotic leakage following EA repair. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with EA who underwent surgical repair at a single tertiary center between 2010 and 2024. Patients with type E EA were excluded. Clinical characteristics, operative variables, postoperative complications, feeding outcomes, and long-term esophageal morbidities were compared according to the presence of anastomotic leakage. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with anastomotic stricture and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Results: A total of 143 patients were included, of whom 36 (25.2%) developed anastomotic leakage. Patients with leakage had a higher incidence of anastomotic stricture than those without leakage (78% vs. 57%, Conclusion: Anastomotic leakage after EA repair is associated with delayed feeding progression, increased esophageal morbidity, and a higher risk of unplanned reoperation. In addition, anastomotic leakage remained associated with GERD after adjustment for the available covariates. These findings suggest that patients who experience postoperative leakage represent a high-risk group that may benefit from careful long-term surveillance and multidisciplinary follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.