ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Predicting physical activity energy expenditure, types, and intensity using long short-term memory networks in aged 6-18 cross-stage populations.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurately estimating physical activity (PA) and energy expenditure of children and adolescents cross-stage are key issues in sports medicine and beyond. Objective: This study aims to develop and test a long short-term memory (LSTM) network to predict physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE), types, and intensity using accelerometer data collected in children and adolescents. Methods: A total of 120 healthy participants aged 6-18 years completed 13 PA tasks while wearing triaxial accelerometers at 9 body sites and simultaneously wore the portable metabolic analyzer. 59 features were extracted from accelerometer signals, combined with demographic data to build LSTM models for cross-stage and single-stage (childhood, early and late adolescence), respectively, and compared with the results of 3 ensemble learning (random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting machine). Results: The RMSE for predicting PAEE across and single stages were about 0.55 metabolic equivalents (METs) to 0.73 METs, and an average reduction of about 55% in RMSE over ensemble learning. The RMSE for predicting energy expenditure of a specific PA type was averaged about 0.38 METs to 0.49 METs, and an average reduction of about 60% in RMSE over ensemble learning. The recall for predicting PA types was about 90% to 93%, with an average relative improvement of about 70% over ensemble learning. The recall for predicted PA intensity was about 90% to 93%, with an average relative improvement of about 32% over ensemble learning. Conclusions: LSTM showed strong generalizability and robustness in cross-stage PA monitoring, offering an accurate and scalable solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.