ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Outcomes of infantile leukemia in a Saudi multicenter cohort: patterns of treatment response, treatment failure, relapse, and survival.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Infantile leukemia is a rare and aggressive form of pediatric leukemia associated with high rates of treatment failure, relapse, and mortality. Despite advances in leukemia therapy, evidence from Saudi Arabia remains limited, particularly regarding treatment response and survival outcomes among infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Aim: This study aimed to describe treatment response, treatment failure, relapse, overall survival, and event-free survival among infants with acute leukemia treated at two tertiary referral centers in Saudi Arabia, and to explore outcome differences according to leukemia subtype. Methods: A retrospective multicenter observational cohort study was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Riyadh and Jeddah. The study included 41 patients diagnosed with infantile leukemia between January 2012 and December 2021. Data were extracted from medical records using a structured data collection form. Demographic, clinical, treatment-response, relapse, treatment-failure, and survival outcomes were summarized using descriptive statistics. Comparisons between ALL and AML were performed using Fisher's exact test where appropriate because of small cell counts. Overall survival and event-free survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Results: Of the 41 patients, 24 (58.5%) had ALL and 17 (41.5%) had AML. At last follow-up, 22 patients (53.7%) were alive and 19 (46.3%) had died. Among patients evaluable after first-line therapy, 20 of 26 (76.9%) achieved first complete remission. Disease reactivation or relapse occurred in 11 patients (26.8%), death in remission in 6 (14.6%), and treatment failure or refractory disease in 6 (14.6%). Median overall survival was not reached for the total cohort, while median event-free survival was 23.27 months. No statistically significant differences were observed between ALL and AML in overall survival, log-rank p = .930, or event-free survival, log-rank p = .778. Conclusion: Infantile leukemia was associated with considerable adverse outcomes in this Saudi multicenter cohort, including relapse, death in remission, treatment failure, and mortality. Leukemia subtype alone was not significantly associated with survival or adverse outcome patterns. These findings should be interpreted as descriptive and hypothesis-generating because of the small sample size and limited statistical power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.