Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548503›Full record

ArticleCHEST pulmonary2024

Effect of Eccentric Cycling on Oxygen Uptake and Hemodynamics in Patients With Pulmonary Vascular Disease: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.

Julian Müller, Simon R Schneider, Anna Titz, Claudia Thalmann, Esther I Schwarz, Christoph Bauer, Ekkehard Grünig, Malcolm Kohler, Mona Lichtblau, Silvia Ulrich

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05186987 (Visa-versa! Breaking Instead of Pushing the Pedals), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05186987 nacompletednot on this map

Visa-versa! Breaking Instead of Pushing the Pedals: Eccentric Exercise to Improve Training Performance in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension. A Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2022 to 2023Enrolled33ConditionsPulmonary HypertensionArms15 minutes eccentric cycling, 15 minutes concentric (normal) cycling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julian MüllerDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Simon R SchneiderDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Anna TitzDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Claudia ThalmannDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Esther I SchwarzDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph BauerFaculty of Sport and Health Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Ekkehard GrünigThoraxclinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Malcolm KohlerDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mona LichtblauDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Silvia UlrichDepartment of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Eccentric cycling exercise (ECC) allows training at low metabolic costs and may therefore be valuable for patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) due to pulmonary vascular disease (PVD). Research Question: What are the ventilatory and circulatory responses of ECC vs concentric cycling exercise (CON) in patients with PVD? Study Design and Methods: This was a randomized controlled crossover trial in which patients diagnosed with PVD, defined as either pulmonary arterial or chronic thromboembolic PH, performed CON and ECC cycling tests at identical submaximal work rates, following stepwise incremental protocols. Oxygen uptake and additional cardiorespiratory responses were measured breath-by-breath by ergospirometry. Hemodynamic parameters (eg, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure [sPAP], tricuspid annular plain systolic excursion) were measured by echocardiography. Results: Thirty-three patients (19 with pulmonary arterial hypertension and 14 with chronic thromboembolic PH; 13 female; mean age, 50 ± 15 years) were included. At identical work rates during ECC compared with CON, oxygen uptake was significantly lower by -200 mL/min (-40%; 95% CI, -272 to -129; Interpretation: This study supports the hypothesis that ECC is a feasible and well-tolerated exercise modality for patients with PVD, with lower oxygen demand and a reduced load on the right ventricle. Future studies should investigate whether ECC improves exercise capacity, muscle force, and possibly hemodynamics during prolonged rehabilitation programs in patients with PVD. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05186987; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

cardiopulmonary exercise testingCTEPHeccentric cycling exercisePAHpulmonary hypertensionpulmonary vascular diseaserehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42548503
PMCPMC13418942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.