Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548487›Full record

ArticleCHEST pulmonary2023

Acquisition of Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound Images With Deep Learning: A Randomized Trial for Educational Outcomes With Novices.

Evan Baum, Megha D Tandel, Casey Ren, Yingjie Weng, Matthew Pascucci, John Kugler, Kathryn Cardoza, Andre Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Evan BaumDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford.
Megha D TandelQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford.
Casey RenDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford.
Yingjie WengQuantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford.
Matthew PascucciDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford.
John KuglerDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford.
Kathryn CardozaDepartment of Medicine, Cedars Sinai, Los Angeles, CA.
Andre KumarDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) machines may use deep learning, a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI), to improve image interpretation and acquisition in real time. The impact of AI on POCUS learning is unknown. Research Question: Do AI-enhanced devices equipped with deep learning aid in cardiac image acquisition and interpretation among POCUS novices? Study Design and Methods: We conducted a single-center investigation from 2021 through 2022. Internal medicine trainees (N = 43) with limited POCUS experience were randomized to receive a POCUS device with (Echonous; n = 22) or without (Butterfly; n = 21) AI functionality for 2 weeks while on inpatient rotations. AI device functionality included guidance for optimal probe placement to acquire an apical four-chamber (A4C) view and ejection fraction estimations based on deep learning. Participants used the devices at their discretion for patient-related care after randomization. The primary outcome was the time to acquire A4C images on a standardized patient. Secondary outcomes included A4C image quality using a validated scale, image quiz performance, and attitudes. Measurements were performed at randomization and at 2-week follow-up using the same standardized patient. Results: Both AI and non-AI groups showed similar scan times and image quality scores at baseline. At follow-up, the AI group showed faster scan times (57 s [interquartile range (IQR), 32-75 s] vs 85 s [IQR, 50-172 s]; Interpretation: POCUS devices with deep learning functionality may improve A4C image acquisition and interpretation by novices. Future studies are needed to determine the extent that AI impacts POCUS learning.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebedside ultrasoundcompetencydeep learningechocardiogrammedical educationpatient carepoint-of-care ultrasoundtechnique

Identifiers

PMID42548487
PMCPMC13418877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.