ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Clinical features of failure of conservative management in adult patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common cause of acute abdominal pain in adults. Most patients with ASBO without strangulation are successfully managed conservatively. However, some patients fail nonoperative treatment, develop intestinal ischemia and undergo surgical management. The clinical features of these patients require further investigation. Methods: Patients who received conservative management as the initial treatment for ASBO between January 2017 and December 2025 were selected from the electronic medical records of a single institution. The patients were categorized into a successful conservative treatment group (group A) and a surgery group (group B). Demographic and clinical variables were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 510 patients were included in this retrospective study. Groups A and B comprised 456 and 54 patients, respectively. Univariable analysis demonstrated a significant difference in five factors: age, multiple previous operations, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, body temperature, and maximum diameter of the dilated small bowel (MDSB) ( Conclusion: Our study established older age, higher CRP level, fever, and larger MDSB on admission as risk factors for failure of conservative ASBO management. The risk of ASBO recurrence was not increased by surgical intervention. Although these results should be interpreted with caution, these findings might assist clinical practice. Conversion to operation increases the length of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, and intensive care unit admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.