ArticleCHEST pulmonary2024
Hemodynamic Risk Assessment by Thermodilution and Direct Fick Measurement of Cardiac Output in Pulmonary Hypertension.
Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Right heart catheterization blended training program: quality improvement and educational outcomes.ATS scholar · 2026Article
- Critical Analysis of Hemodynamic Risk Assessment: Insights on Thermodilution vs Direct Fick Methods in Pulmonary Hypertension.CHEST pulmonary · 2024Article
- Response.CHEST pulmonary · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate measurement of cardiac output (CO) is critical in the evaluation and monitoring of pulmonary hypertension (PH). We assessed the accuracy of thermodilution (TD) CO vs direct Fick (DF) CO among patients with PH and evaluated whether the method of CO measurement affected diagnosis or risk assessment. Research Question: Does using Thermodilution CO as compared to Direct Fick CO alter hemodynamic risk status in PH? Study Design and Methods: We included patients who had undergone a right heart catheterization with both TD CO and DF CO measurements at University of California, Los Angeles between January 2021 and January 2023. Based on the cardiac index, patients were classified into low-, intermediate-, or high-risk hemodynamic status according to the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines. Results: The analysis included 116 patients with PH. Of the patients, 55% were on PH therapy at the time of catheterization. The median age was 59 years (25th-75th percentile, 50-69), and 63% were female. The median TD CO and DF CO were 4.6 L/min (25th-75th percentile, 3.6-6.0) and 5.3 L/min (25th-75th percentile, 4.2-7.0) ( Interpretation: Hemodynamic risk status was concordant between TD and DF measurements in almost 80% of patients. Oxygen consumption measurement should be considered if available on index right heart catheterization in patients with PH to aid in hemodynamic risk stratification or in whom strict pulmonary vascular resistance calculations are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.