ArticleCHEST pulmonary2024
Outcomes and Clinical Practices in Follow-Up of Nonmalignant Pulmonary Nodules After Bronchoscopic Biopsy.
Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and deployment of robots in a bronchoscopy suite.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Management of nonmalignant nodules after bronchoscopic biopsy lacks thorough investigation, leading to varied clinical approaches. Research Question: What are the true-negative and false-negative rates of nonmalignant nodules by bronchoscopic biopsy, and what is the clinical practice pattern for follow-up? Study Design and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for pulmonary nodules biopsied via bronchoscopy between 2019 and 2020 revealing no malignancy. True-negative and false-negative rates were calculated. Clinical practice patterns for repeat biopsy and follow-up imaging studies were analyzed using time-to-event analysis. Covariates, including sex, age, smoking history, nodule size, maximum standardized uptake values, active cancer diagnosis, bronchoscopy type, and nodule pathologic findings, were evaluated for their impact on clinical decision-making. Results: Among 136 patients with 139 nodules analyzed, only 39.6% of nodules were classified definitively as benign (true-negative rate), whereas 23.7% of nodules were deemed malignant (false-negative rate). Repeat biopsy was performed for 35.3% of nodules, and 66.9% of patients underwent follow-up CT imaging. Nodules initially diagnosed with suspicious or atypical pathologic results reached a final diagnosis (hazard ratio, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.33-9.99) earlier than those with nondiagnostic pathologic findings. Patients with such nodules underwent repeat biopsy sooner (χ Interpretation: After bronchoscopic biopsy, a 2-year follow-up revealed a notable lack of high true-negative rates for nonmalignant nodules, alongside significant false-negative rates. Diverse clinical practices, including repeat biopsy and follow-up CT scans, were observed in managing nonmalignant nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.