Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548430›Full record

ArticleCHEST pulmonary2024

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Long COVID: Evaluating Functional Capacity and Exercise Limitations.

Lotte Sørensen, Camilla Lundgren Pedersen, Mads Jønsson Andersen, Johannes Martin Schmid, Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard, Berit Schiøttz-Christensen, Søren Sperling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. CHEST pulmonary · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Physical impairments in individuals with Long COVID.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lotte SørensenDepartment of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Camilla Lundgren PedersenDiagnostic Centre, University Research Clinic for Innovative Patient Pathways, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Mads Jønsson AndersenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Johannes Martin SchmidDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lisa Gregersen OestergaardDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Berit Schiøttz-ChristensenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren SperlingDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: After COVID-19, some patients present with ongoing symptoms (eg, breathlessness, exercise limitations), even after mild acute infection. Research Question: What is the exercise capacity of patients diagnosed with long COVID and does it change from baseline to 1-year follow-up? Study Design and Methods: This retrospective case series included patients with persistent symptoms after a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Exercise capacity was examined by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and parameters related to performance, ventilation, circulation, and gas exchange were compared with predicted values. A subgroup of patients was retested 1 year after baseline, and self-reported physical fitness was assessed at follow-up. Results: In total, 169 patients completed baseline CPET and 41 patients completed 1-year follow-up. Mean maximum workload was 172 W (95% CI, 161-182), with 19% not achieving at least 84% predicted workload. Mean peak oxygen uptake was 24.4 mL/kg/min (95% CI, 23.1-25.7), and 36% had a value below % predicted. Oxygen uptake/workload slope below the normal threshold of 8.4 mL/min/W was observed in 54% of patients. The 1-year follow-up results showed no statistically significant changes in any of the CPET parameters, which correspond to lack of improvement in self-reported physical fitness. Interpretation: Patients with long COVID demonstrated lowered peak oxygen uptake, oxygen uptake/workload slope, and/or ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide, but different parameters were lowered in different patients, illustrating a heterogeneous study population. No improvements in any parameters were found at 1-year follow-up.

Indexed as

cardiopulmonary exercise testingexercise capacitylong COVIDpostacute COVID-19 syndromeSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID42548430
PMCPMC13420476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.