ArticleCHEST pulmonary2024
Dynamic Digital Radiography Pulmonary Function Testing: A Machine Learning Lung Study Alternative.
Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the Clinical Potential of Dynamic Digital Radiography: A Narrative Review.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Common diagnostic tests for pulmonary disorders include chest radiography and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Although essential, these tests only offer a static assessment. Chest dynamic digital radiography (DDR) integrates lung and diaphragm motion in one study with limited radiation exposure. DDR is relatively easy to obtain, but barriers to its clinical adoption include time-consuming manual analysis and unclear correlation with PFTs. Research Question: Can a machine learning pipeline automate DDR analysis? What is the strength of the relationship between PFT measures and automated DDR-based lung area measurements? Study Design and Methods: PFT and DDR studies were obtained in 55 participants. We developed an analysis pipeline using convolutional neural networks capable of quantifying lung areas in DDR images to generate DDR-based PFTs (dPFTs). PFT and dPFT measures were correlated in patients with normal, obstructive, and restrictive lung physiology. Results: We observed statistically significant ( Interpretation: Statistically significant correlations found between dPFTs and PFTs suggest that dPFTs can act as a surrogate to PFTs when these are not available or unable to be performed. This study contributes to the potential integration of DDR as a reliable alternative to PFTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.