ArticleCHEST pulmonary2025
A Multicenter Retrospective Study Evaluating IL-5-Targeted Biologic Therapies for the Treatment of Asthma and Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis.
Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biologic therapies targeting T-helper cell type 2 (Th2) eosinophilic inflammation have been used for difficult-to-treat asthma and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), but safety and efficacy data are limited in the cystic fibrosis (CF) population. Research Question: Are Th2 biologic therapies targeting eosinophilic inflammation effective and safe when used in adults with CF with asthma and/or ABPA overlap? Study Design and Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter study. Individuals with CF receiving Th2 biologic therapies for asthma or ABPA at 2 large adult CF centers between 2016 and 2021 were included. Treatment safety and effectiveness up to 12 months after biologic initiation were evaluated. Outcomes of interest included percent predicted FEV Results: Forty adults with CF received Th2 biologic therapies targeting eosinophilic inflammation during the study period. A total of 38 were eligible for study inclusion, and all received IL-5-directed therapies (mepolizumab: n = 27, benralizumab: n = 11): 17 (45%) for asthma only and 21 for ABPA (55%) with or without asthma. No significant biologic-related adverse effects were observed. There was no statistical difference in ppFEV Interpretation: Our results show that in adults with CF, anti-IL-5 biologic therapies were well tolerated and can improve rate of change in lung function, but there was no impact on SCS use or PEx frequency. Further study is needed to better define the role of Th2 biologics in the era of highly effective modulator therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.