ArticleCHEST pulmonary2024
Employment of the Envisia Genomic Classifier in Conjunction With Cryobiopsy in Patients With Undiagnosed Interstitial Lung Disease.
Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Genomic classifier: biomarker for progression in interstitial lung disease.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Progression of interstitial lung disease after the Envisia Genomic Classifier.ERJ open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Envisia Genomic Classifier (EGC) is a clinically validated molecular diagnostic test identifying usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), increasing the diagnostic confidence for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Research Question: What is the association of the EGC and lung cryobiopsy on clinical management decisions in patients with fibrotic ILD? Study Design and Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients at multimedical centers. We assessed the change in management strategy after EGC and cryobiopsy. We evaluated the association between genomic UIP classification and disease progression using the American Thoracic Society definition of progressive pulmonary fibrosis (method 1), or combined end point of death from any cause, lung transplant, or ≥ 10% relative decline in FVC (method 2). Results: In patients that were EGC positive for UIP (gcUIP+), 78.6% were diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Cryobiopsy and EGC test results changed management strategy for 59.5% of patients in the cohort that were gcUIP+, and 21.4% of patients that had indeterminate cryobiopsy interpretations were gcUIP+, leading to a change in treatment strategy of an additional 16.7%. There was a decrease in follow-up without treatment from 64.3% to 11.9% ( Interpretation: This study suggests that combined EGC and cryobiopsy are associated with change in therapeutic strategy in patients with undiagnosed ILD. The EGC might serve as a predictor for disease progression in patients not treated with antifibrotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.