ArticleCHEST pulmonary2025
Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Worsening of the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis With Mild or Moderate Impairment in Lung Function.
Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase 3, Three-Arm Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Pirfenidone in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase 3 Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Pirfenidone in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (UCSD-SOBQ) is used commonly in clinical trials to evaluate dyspnea in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Previously, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for UCSD-SOBQ was estimated at 8 points for patients with IPF with severe impairment as determined by lung function tests. Research Question: What is the MCID threshold for UCSD-SOBQ worsening in patients with IPF and less physiologic impairment? Study Design and Methods: Pooled data from patients with baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) of ≥ 50% predicted enrolled in the 2 randomized phase 3 CAPACITY trials of pirfenidone (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00287716 and NCT00287729) were analyzed. Over the 72-week treatment period, the MCIDs for the UCSD-SOBQ were estimated using anchor-based methods by comparing changes in UCSD-SOBQ scores with values for stability/improvement vs worsening in 4 candidate anchors: FVC, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (Dlco), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire activity domain (SGRQ-A). Anchors that correlated with UCSD-SOBQ scores for at least 1 measurement (correlation coefficient ≥ 0.3) were included for MCID determination in a receiver operating characteristics approach. Results: Overall, UCSD-SOBQ score changes were similar within stability/improvement and worsening categories for FVC, Dlco, and 6MWD anchors. For the SGRQ-A anchor, for stability/improvement, UCSD-SOBQ changes were lower than for the other anchors; for worsening, changes were greater. Based on suitable correlation coefficients, FVC, 6MWD, and SGRQ-A were the anchors used to triangulate the MCID. Optimal anchor cut points (MCID) for worsening were 6 for FVC, 4.3 for 6MWD, and 5.8 for SGRQ-A, which resulted in a Interpretation: Our results show that in patients with IPF and mild or moderate physiologic impairment, the UCSD-SOBQ has a MCID for worsening of 4 to 6 with a point estimate of 6. Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00287716 and NCT00287729; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.