ArticleCHEST pulmonary2024
Significance of Normal Lung Volume on Quantitative CT Imaging Analysis in Group 1 and Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension.
Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A self-supervised framework for emphysema anomaly detection and staging in computed tomography scans.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Interstitial Lung Disease Outcome Prediction Using Quantitative Densitometry Indices on Baseline Chest Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with concurrent pulmonary hypertension (PH) and parenchymal lung diseases have a high risk of mortality. However, whether their outcomes are related to low normal lung volume (NLV) resulting from parenchymal lung diseases on chest high-resolution CT (HRCT) imaging remains unknown. Research Question: Would NLV on quantitative HRCT imaging affect disease behavior in patients with PH? Study Design and Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated patients with physician-diagnosed group 1 and group 3 PH among 1,471 patients who underwent right heart catheterization. Using a 3-dimensional image analysis system for HRCT imaging, the percentage of NLV (-950 to -600 Hounsfield units) to the whole lungs (%NLV) was calculated. The optimal cutoff point of %NLV for predicting survival was examined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to detect the association between %NLV and prognosis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association of %NLV with response to pulmonary vasodilators. Results: Overall, 157 patients (mean age, 53.1 ± 17.6 years; sex, n = 111 [70.7%] female patients) were included. ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff of %NLV for predicting survival was 83.2%. The patients with %NLV of ≥ 83.2% showed significantly higher 5-year survival than that of those with %NLV of < 83.2% (81.7% vs 36.6%; Interpretation: Quantitative CT imaging analysis might allow numerical quantification of the lung condition and vasodilator-treatable area beyond subjective visual assessment in patients with PH. The %NLV could be a novel predictor of prognosis and treatment response in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.