Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548353›Full record

ArticleCHEST pulmonary2024

The Diagnostic Yield of Cone Beam CT Combined With Radial-Endobronchial Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Michael V Brown, Arash Badiei, Matthew Arnold, Hubertus Jersmann, Thomas Sullivan, David Fielding, Phan Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diagnostic Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Lung Lesions: When Innovation Races to Meet Demand.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael V BrownDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
Arash BadieiDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
Matthew ArnoldFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.
Hubertus JersmannDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
Thomas SullivanSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.
David FieldingDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Phan NguyenDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Identification of peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPNs) is becoming increasingly common with modern imaging and lung cancer screening programs. Navigational bronchoscopy has been developed to augment the diagnostic yield of sampling these nodules. Cone beam CT (CBCT) scan is one navigational tool which can be used alongside the historical criterion standard of fluoroscopy and radial endobronchial ultrasound (r-EBUS). Research Question: What is the diagnostic yield and safety profile of combining CBCT scan with r-EBUS for the diagnosis of PPNs? Study Design and Methods: Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched in March 2023. Eligible studies used CBCT scan with r-EBUS as the primary navigation technique. The primary outcome, diagnostic yield, was analyzed using random effects meta-analysis. Additional subgroup analysis was based on the use of additional navigational technologies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool for diagnostic studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool was used to assess the quality of outcomes. Results: Fourteen studies (865 patients and 882 lesions) were included. The risk of bias was significant as assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool, which identified multiple confounders. The pooled diagnostic yield of combined CBCT scan and r-EBUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of PPNs was 80% (95% CI, 76%-84%). Subgroup analysis of diagnostic yield for CBCT scan and r-EBUS alone was 80% (95% CI, 76%-83%). The diagnostic yield of CBCT scan and r-EBUS combined with additional navigational technology (electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy, virtual bronchoscopic navigation, and robotic-assisted bronchoscopy) was 80% (95% CI, 73%-87%). The quality of outcomes was assessed as low to very low using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool. There was a 2.01% pneumothorax rate and 1.08% bleeding rate. Although heterogeneously reported, the total radiation dose was between 19.59 and 85.9 Gy.cm Interpretation: CBCT scan and r-EBUS for the diagnosis of PPNs has a high diagnostic yield and acceptable safety profile. Studies showed moderate heterogeneity with significant bias; hence, generalizability of the study is limited and further prospective trials are required. Clinical Trial Registration: PROSPERO; No.: CRD42023410221; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Indexed as

cone beam CT scanlung cancerperipheral pulmonary noduleradial endobronchial ultrasoundsolitary pulmonary nodule

Identifiers

PMID42548353
PMCPMC13417805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.