Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548284›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026

Collaboration With Clinicians in Inpatient Mental Healthcare: A Qualitative Investigation of Consumer Perspectives.

Joel Sebastian Zugai, Katherine Gill, Grant Kinghorn, Lucie Ramjan, Yenna Salamonson, Luke Molloy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joel Sebastian ZugaiSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-7183
Katherine GillConsumer Led Research Network, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7174-0888
Grant KinghornSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5015-9226
Lucie RamjanSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7815-3005
Yenna SalamonsonSchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7429-4086
Luke MolloySchool of Nursing, University of Wollongong, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6120-9380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaboration is a foundational characteristic of ethical mental healthcare. However, inpatient mental healthcare often fails to espouse the practices and principles that would establish meaningful collaborative care, with coercion and restrictive practices an ongoing aspect of consumers' lived experience. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to understand consumers' perspectives of collaboration with clinicians in the inpatient mental health setting. One-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 people who have experienced involuntary inpatient mental healthcare; data were analysed by thematic analysis. The participants of this study valued collaborative inpatient mental healthcare. However, they reported that their own perspectives were not sufficiently sought or considered. Clinicians' default scepticism compounded participants' experiences of inconsideration. In contrast, genuinely caring interpersonal relationships with clinicians were valued, establishing a sense of safety and collaboration. The failure to establish collaboration requires systemic reform and the resolution of micro-cultures that disenfranchise the perspectives of people receiving inpatient mental healthcare. Notably, the participants of this study reported that interpersonal relationships with clinicians facilitated meaningful collaboration. Collaboration relies on the presence of strong interpersonal care; the culture, policy and structures of inpatient mental healthcare must be oriented to be interpersonal.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorMental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdultFemaleHumansInpatientsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative Researchcommunicationhealth care ethicshospitalsmental healthpsychiatricqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42548284
PMCPMC13434664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.