Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548252›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026

Nerve Injury Following Birth, the Role of Epidural Analgesia-A Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Louise Mathilde Loft Sakhat, Amanda Prip Dohn, Bo Biering-Sørensen, Kenneth Geving Andersen, Line Thellesen, Kim Wildgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Louise Mathilde Loft SakhatAnaesthesia Critical and Emergency Care Science Unit and Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9177-9935
Amanda Prip DohnAnaesthesia Critical and Emergency Care Science Unit and Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Bo Biering-SørensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7682-1353
Kenneth Geving AndersenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8371-2326
Line ThellesenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4765-1447
Kim WildgaardAnaesthesia Critical and Emergency Care Science Unit and Department of Anaesthesiology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7084-9200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidural analgesia is widely used during labor, and postpartum nerve injury is an uncommon but clinically relevant outcome. Neurological symptoms after childbirth may be related to obstetric or anesthetic factors. Studies vary considerably in how postpartum nerve injury is identified, defined, assessed, and followed, limiting comparability and interpretation of findings.

objectiveTo map the methodological approaches used to study postpartum nerve injury following epidural analgesia, including case identification strategies, diagnostic assessment methods, follow-up procedures, and reporting of obstetric and anesthetic attribution.

methodsA scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR framework. Studies reporting postpartum nerve injury in relation to epidural procedures will be identified through systematic database searching. Data will be charted on study design, exposure definitions, strategies for etiological attribution, outcome ascertainment, and follow-up methods. DISCUSSION: The scoping review aims to map how postpartum nerve injury has been defined, identified, assessed, and followed in the literature, as well as clarify methodological patterns and inconsistencies. The findings may inform future research by highlighting variation in methodology, reporting practices and terminology. Thereby indicating areas where more consistent approaches to neurological assessment, exposure reporting, and attribution of obstetric and anesthetic factors are needed.

Indexed as

Analgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, ObstetricalPeripheral Nerve InjuriesFemaleHumansParturitionPregnancyScoping Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42548252
PMCPMC13434671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.