Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548238›Full record

ArticleBiology open2026

Aerodynamic limits of gliding flight in grey-headed albatrosses under variable wind conditions.

Janine Schoombie, Kenneth J Craig, Lelanie Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janine SchoombieDepartment of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa0021.ORCID 0000-0001-5085-9516
Kenneth J CraigDepartment of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa0021.ORCID 0000-0002-7960-2148
Lelanie SmithDepartment of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa0021.ORCID 0000-0001-8022-0000

Funding

University of Pretoria
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult grey-headed albatrosses breeding on Marion Island, South Africa, experience highly variable near-ground wind vectors that can result in crash landings, some of which are fatal. This study quantifies the combinations of airspeed and wind direction that can lead to loss of lift or the generation of downforce sufficient to cause such crashes. Using previously developed three-dimensional grey-headed albatross body geometry, we conducted numerical simulations of this rigid geometry across a wide range of flight conditions defined by airspeed, angle of attack, and sideslip angle. Lift and aerodynamic efficiency (lift-to-drag ratio) were then evaluated to identify the conditions under which insufficient lift was produced. Simulations show that for airspeeds below 10 m s-1, the generated lift was lower than the average weight of an adult grey-headed albatross, with peak aerodynamic efficiency occurring at an angle of attack of approximately 5°. While the geometry generates lift effectively under either strong crosswinds or downdrafts alone, their combination can produce substantial downforce. Given that albatrosses preferentially exploit crosswinds at the meso-scale, transient gusts combining crosswind and downdraft components may force birds into the ground, particularly during low-altitude nest departure, increasing the likelihood of fatal crash landings.

Indexed as

BirdsFlight, AnimalWindAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationAlbatross aerodynamicsAlbatross flight performanceComputational fluid dynamicsGrey-headed albatrossSoaring flightWind-seabird interactions

Identifiers

PMID42548238
PMCPMC13602366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.