Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548176›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2026

How Equity and Quality Are Considered by Cancer Centers Offering Practice-Integrated Telehealth Visits: A Qualitative Study.

Lauren Jordan Barrow, Ilona Fridman, Regina Jones, Chris Neslund Dudas, Samantha H Tam, Tiffany Yeh, Jennifer Elston Lafata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren Jordan BarrowDepartment of Health Policy and Management, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0482-9735
Ilona FridmanCenter for Discovery and Innovation, Cancer Prevention, Precision & Control Institute, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ, USA.
Regina JonesPatient and Family Advisory Council, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Chris Neslund DudasHenry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Samantha H TamHenry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
Tiffany YehEat Well Global, Inc, White Plains, NY, USA.
Jennifer Elston LafataDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8550-6195

Funding

Center for Virtual Care Value and Excellence (ViVE). RC2TR004380 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Saif Khairat · 2023 to 2026
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS RC2 TR004380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic forever changed health care delivery and led to a rapid uptake in telehealth visits. However, the quality and equity of these visits compared to in-person visits are unknown. This analysis interviewed oncology practitioners to understand how US-based cancer centers considered care quality and equity in the implementation and sustainability of telehealth programs.

methodsThis qualitative study employed semistructured interviews to explore practitioners' experiences and perceptions regarding care equity and quality within integrated telehealth services. Primary data collection occurred through interviews conducted between October 2021 and January 2023. These interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis.

resultsFour main themes, representing interviews with 39 professionals from 16 organizations, were identified: 1) organization-level diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts remained conceptual and disconnected from oncology telehealth services, 2) equity and quality-related actions were predominately reactive rather than proactive, 3) equity was misinterpreted as providing equal care to all patients, and 4) telehealth quality and equity were not systematically measured or prioritized. DISCUSSION: These findings highlight how organizational DEI efforts did not translate to tangible operational practices in oncology telehealth care. These results suggest limited organization DEI maturity and practice-level accountability for equity and quality and a lack of understanding of equity.

conclusionTo deliver high-quality and equitable oncology telehealth, cancer centers and other health care organizations must progress beyond awareness of equity issues. They need to implement concrete resources, support systems, and policies that facilitate effective strategy execution.

Indexed as

Cancer Care FacilitiesHealth EquityQuality of Health CareTelemedicineAttitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19HumansQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2United Statescare qualityhealth care disparitieshealth care equityhealthcare managementintegrated virtual visitsoncologyqualitative interviewstelehealth

Identifiers

PMID42548176
PMCPMC13576032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.