Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42548155›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Pupil size reveals the perceptual quality and effortless nature of synesthesia.

Christoph Strauch, Casper Leenaars, Romke Rouw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christoph StrauchExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6380-8635
Casper LeenaarsExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Romke RouwBrain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9697-5360

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 10.61686/EEGGV23807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synesthesia describes cross-over processes that can generate 'extra' conscious percepts, such as seeing additional color when reading numbers. While existing research focuses on the mechanisms and effects of synesthetic associations, it often overlooks its most distinctive feature: unique sensory phenomenology. Here, we introduce pupillometry as an objective physiological measure of synesthetic color phenomenology. Across 16 grapheme-color synesthetes and two matched control groups, pupil responses tracked the brightness of synesthetic colors under constant physical visual input, scaling with self-reported strength. Synesthetic colors elicited pupil dynamics comparable to real colors, dissociating synesthetes from non-synesthetes. These responses emerged too rapidly to reflect imagery and scaled with reported color brightness, revealing cross-over caused genuine perceptual processing. Controls required to generate color associations showed greater effort-linked pupil dilation than synesthetes or controls who did not report colors, providing evidence for the effortless nature of synesthesia. Synesthesia thus provides a tractable human model for studying physiologically measurable phenomenology.

Indexed as

Color PerceptionPerceptual DisordersPupilAdultFemaleHumansMaleSynesthesiaYoung Adultconsciousnesscross-modalneurosciencenoneperceptionphenomenologypupil sizesynesthesia

Identifiers

PMID42548155
PMCPMC13436957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.