ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2026
Coastal Flood Risk Governance in Newfoundland, Canada: A Multidimensional Analysis of Assessment, Management, and Communication.
Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coastal communities in Newfoundland, Canada, face significant and escalating flood risks due to heavy precipitation, coastal storms, and climate change impacts, positioning the region as highly vulnerable despite existing mitigation efforts. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of coastal flood risk governance in Newfoundland, drawing upon a qualitative review of secondary literature, including academic studies, government reports, and policy documents. The analysis is structured around five crucial components of risk governance: interdisciplinary risk estimation (encompassing risk assessment and concern assessment), risk characterization and evaluation, risk management (including monitoring, prevention, protection, preparedness, and mitigation), and risk communication. Findings reveal that although Newfoundland employs various tools for hazard identification (e.g., LiDAR, hydrological models) and vulnerability assessment, challenges persist in data resolution, equitable resource distribution, and consistent public engagement. Effective risk management integrates structural and nonstructural measures, emphasizing continuous monitoring and adaptive planning. Furthermore, robust risk communication strategies, involving scientific experts and credible information sources, are vital for fostering public awareness and shared responsibilities. The study concludes that an integrated, adaptive, and collaborative governance framework that prioritizes equity and community resilience represents a theoretically grounded and conceptually promising pathway to mitigate future flood risks and enhance the well-being of Newfoundland's coastal populations, though empirical validation of this proposition through primary research remains a necessary next step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.