ArticleAnnals of transplantation2026
The Anatomical Landscape of Living Donor Livers: A 101-Case Retrospective Single-Center Study in Indonesia From 2010 to 2025.
Article in Annals of transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Errate: The Anatomical Landscape of Living Donor Livers: A 101-Case Retrospective Single-Center Study in Indonesia From 2010 to 2025.Annals of transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anatomical variations of the hepatic vasculature and bile ducts are critical considerations in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), yet population-specific data remain limited. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate hepatic artery, portal vein, hepatic vein, and intrahepatic bile duct anatomy in 101 living liver donors at a single center in Indonesia from 2010 to 2025, and to identify donor characteristics associated with these variations. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective review was performed on 101 living liver donors at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Indonesia (2010-2025). Hepatic artery and portal/hepatic vein anatomy were assessed using computed tomography angiography (CTA), and biliary anatomy using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Variations were classified according to the Michel, Nakamura, and Huang systems. Logistic and multinomial regression analyses evaluated demographic predictors, and linear regression assessed operative time. RESULTS Donors (mean age 31.8±6.2 years; body mass index [BMI] 22.6 kg/m²; 62.5% female) were predominantly Javanese and Sumatran. Canonical anatomy predominated (Michel I 70.8%; Nakamura I 71.9%; Huang A1 59.7%). Sumatran donors demonstrated higher frequencies of hepatic artery and portal vein variants. Increasing age predicted hepatic artery variation (aOR 1.08/year, P=0.046), while BMI influenced portal vein subtypes (P=0.006). No factors affected operative time. CONCLUSIONS Canonical anatomy predominated, with ethnic variations seen in Sumatran donors. Age and BMI predicted vascular variations, while biliary anatomy remained stable. Anatomical variations did not affect operative time, highlighting the importance of preoperative imaging and planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.