ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Parental preferences for immunization advisory clinic settings for children with special health care needs and associated factors in Shanghai: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with special health care needs (CSHCN) face persistent immunization inequity despite high overall childhood vaccination coverage. Immunization advisory clinics (IACs) have expanded in China, yet parental preferences for different IAC settings remain poorly understood. This cross-sectional survey was conducted at the IAC of Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, between October and December 2023. Parents of CSHCN younger than 14 y with incomplete National Immunization Program schedules were invited. The primary outcome was parental preference for IAC setting (community clinic, general hospital, or children's hospital); the secondary outcome was preferred vaccination-assessment provider under discordant recommendations. Multinomial and binary logistic regression models identified associated factors, adjusted for child, parent, and vaccine-attitude covariates. Sensitivity analyses were stratified by medication status. Reporting followed the STROBE statement. Of 102 questionnaires, 101 were valid (99.0% response rate). 51.0% of parents preferred community clinics, 25.7% preferred children's hospitals, and 23.3% preferred general hospitals. Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) score was not independently associated with setting preference. Parents of girls were more likely to prefer general hospitals (adjusted RRR, 7.02; 95% CI, 1.50-32.77), whereas lower household income was associated with reduced preference for general hospitals (adjusted RRR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.75). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent findings. Parental preferences for IAC settings among CSHCN families are shaped by child and socioeconomic characteristics rather than by vaccine hesitancy alone. Hybrid hospital-community delivery models and standardized referral pathways may improve vaccination equity for medically complex children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.