Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42547994›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026

Forensic psychiatric evaluation of legal capacity in older adults: Clinical and cognitive correlates.

Mehmet Murat Kırpınar, Zeynep Özge Dağoğlu, Sarp Yoldaş, Merve Rana Altunel Ülkü, İrem Yıldırım, Ömer Faruk Demirel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mehmet Murat KırpınarPsychiatry Department, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Bakırkoy/Istanbul, Turkey.
Zeynep Özge DağoğluPsychiatry Department, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Bakırkoy/Istanbul, Turkey.
Sarp YoldaşPsychiatry Department, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Bakırkoy/Istanbul, Turkey.
Merve Rana Altunel ÜlküPsychiatry Department, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Bakırkoy/Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0244-2967
İrem YıldırımPsychiatry Department, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Bakırkoy/Istanbul, Turkey.
Ömer Faruk DemirelPsychiatry Department, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Bakırkoy/Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic psychiatric evaluation of capacity is commonly requested in clinical practice, particularly in relation to financial decision-making and power of attorney. However, empirical data describing real-world assessment processes and associated clinical factors remain limited. This study examined patients referred for forensic psychiatric evaluation of capacity in a specialized outpatient setting and explored the relationship between routinely administered cognitive screening measures and clinical determinations. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1247 individuals aged 60-98 years who underwent evaluation between 2020 and 2026. Sociodemographic characteristics, clinical assessments, and results of cognitive screening tools-including the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Verbal Fluency Test, and Clock Drawing Test-were analyzed in relation to clinical capacity determinations. Most individuals (90.9%) were assessed as possessing capacity, while 9.1% were considered to lack capacity and were recommended for guardianship. Individuals lacking capacity were older, had fewer years of education, and demonstrated lower performance across all cognitive measures. In multivariable analyses, MMSE and verbal fluency scores were associated with clinical determinations of capacity, whereas demographic variables were not independently associated. ROC analyses showed that MMSE had the highest discriminatory performance among individual measures. Cognitive screening results were interpreted as supportive information within a comprehensive forensic evaluation rather than as standalone determinants of legal capacity. These findings reflect routine clinical practice and highlight the importance of integrating cognitive, clinical, and contextual factors in forensic capacity assessments.

Indexed as

Mental CompetencyAgedAged, 80 and overEducational StatusFemaleForensic PsychiatryHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsRetrospective Studiescognitive assessmentdecision‐making capacityforensic psychiatryMMSEolder adultspower of attorney

Identifiers

PMID42547994
PMCPMC13534960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.