ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Synthetic CT artifacts in MR-only brain radiotherapy: Clinical implementation experience.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides superior soft tissue contrast compared with CT and is essential for delineation of targets and organs at risk in brain radiotherapy. Because CT is traditionally required for dose calculation in radiation therapy, synthetic CT (sCT) generation from MRI has enabled the development of MR-only workflows. Prior studies have primarily focused on dosimetric equivalence between CT- and sCT-based treatment plans, with limited emphasis on practical implementation challenges encountered during clinical use. PURPOSE: This study aimed to share clinical experience implementing an MR-only brain radiotherapy workflow, with a focus on practical challenges encountered.
methodsTwenty-eight patients underwent a dedicated MR simulation protocol for sCT generation in addition to standard-of-care planning CT simulation. MRI acquisition was performed using an immobilization mask with a dedicated head coil positioned over the mask. The sCT protocol consisted of four sequences: T1 VIBE Dixon, T2 SPACE, PETRA, and TOF-MRA. Clinical treatment plans generated using the planning CT (pCT) for photon therapy were recalculated on the corresponding sCT datasets.
resultsTwenty-eight patients were scanned, and 25 synthetic CT datasets were successfully generated. Nine sCT datasets required rigid re-registration because of inter-sequence patient motion. Findings were categorized into workflow-related sCT challenges, including inter-sequence motion, suboptimal coil placement, and external localization marker interference, and algorithm-related imaging artifacts, including HU misclassification at tissue/bone/air interfaces and sCT degradation in post-operative anatomy with surgical meshes.
conclusionClinical implementation of a brain MR-only workflow identified two major categories of challenge: workflow-related sCT perturbations and algorithm-related imaging artifacts. This distinction has important implications for mitigation strategies. Case-specific sCT review, structured eligibility screening, and prospective site commissioning are essential for safe clinical deployment. Practical commissioning and per-patient QA checklists are provided as supplementary materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.