Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42547914›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

Patient-specific automated multi-class anatomical motion tracking on real-time cine MR images using deep learning techniques.

Kaishen Li, Sanjiv S Samant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaishen LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Sanjiv S SamantDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReal-time multi-class motion tracking on cine images during magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) would enable instant monitoring of anatomical structures, facilitating dynamic beam control to minimize overdose to normal tissues and maximize tumor dose. However, conventional segmentation strategies incur significant time delays, making their clinical application impractical. Emerging deep learning (DL) technologies can provide a path to address this clinical challenge. PURPOSE: To propose a patient-specific framework for real-time automated simultaneous tracking of multiple anatomical structures on 2D magnetic resonance cine (cine MR) images acquired in two orthogonal planes, using DL techniques without the need for extensive training data.

methodsIn this study, we evaluated SegResNet, a DL-based auto-segmentation model, and TransMorph, a DL-based registration model. Additionally, conventional rigid and B-spline registration algorithms served as baseline models. Our datasets consist of 10 subjects, with both coronal and sagittal image sequences acquired for each subject using Elekta Unity MR-Linac protocols. With ground truth contours manually delineated for every frame, each model was trained and tested on a subject and plane-specific basis. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), average surface distance (ASD), and center-of-mass errors (COME) were chosen to evaluate the output segmentations of each model. Furthermore, to analyze segmentation motion consistency across two orthogonal planes, the temporal rhythm and physical magnitude of the liver centroid trajectory were evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and the mean-centered Concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), respectively. Finally, a phase-resolved analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of each model across the motion cycle.

resultsSegResNet yielded significantly better results than registration models (p < 0.05). Averaged across all organs, planes, and subjects, SegResNet achieved an overall DSC of 0.97 ± 0.01, HD95 of 3.0 ± 0.9 mm, ASD of 1.1 ± 0.3 mm, and COME of 0.9 ± 0.4 mm. The PCC and mean-centered CCC of SegResNet are 0.77 ± 0.07 and 0.75 ± 0.08, respectively. Furthermore, phase-resolved analysis demonstrated SegResNet's phase-agnostic spatial stability, with no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) observed across the three kinematic states for any organ across all evaluated segmentation metrics. The average inference time for SegResNet is approximately 0.3 ms per frame.

conclusionSegResNet outperformed TransMorph, as well as conventional B-spline and rigid registration models in terms of segmentation accuracy, cross-plane consistency, and robustness across different motion phases, and computation efficiency, potentially allowing for real-time simultaneous motion tracking of multiple anatomical structures on cine MR during MRgRT.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAutomationHumansMotion CaptureMovementTime Factorscine MRdeep learningmotion tracking

Identifiers

PMID42547914
PMCPMC13433807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.