ArticleMedical physics2026
A multidisciplinary experimental and methodological investigation of electron and proton minibeams in the framework of the INFN MIRO project.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
90 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical translation of Minibeam RT (MBRT) has recently started thanks to the first human treatments recently performed. However, despite experimental evidence, the impact of the dose distribution parameters involved on the magnitude of the effect itself and the underlying radiobiological mechanisms are still only partially understood. To address this issue, systematic investigations are needed through the implementation of advanced quantitative experiments with a multidisciplinary approach, which is the one proposed in the framework of the INFN funded MIRO (MInibeam RadiOtherapy) project. PURPOSE: The aim of this work is to report on the on-going main activities recently carried out in the framework of the project, showing some of the main results achieved during the first 2 years of the project, in terms of: (i) facilities development and characterization; (ii) new dosimetric approaches; (iii) biological investigation of the effect; and (iv) development of the first tools for dose planning. The multidisciplinary approach adopted by this national Collaboration to tackle the main challenges of minibeam radiotherapy for a reliable and solid clinical translation is discussed.
methodsThe facilities involved in the project are: (i) two facilities dedicated to low (up to 9 MeV) and medium (up to 18 MeV) energy electron minibeam studies, one of them also equipped with an electron FLASH LINAC to study possible synergistic effects with UHDR beams; (ii) one facility dedicated to proton minibeam studies, with energies from 70 to 140 MeV. Novel dosimetric approaches, are presented, mainly based on scintillators, silicon and silicon carbide detectors. Novel techniques for the analysis of biological samples are described, leveraging both integrated averaged data and spatially resolved analysis. Furthermore, a framework for biological modeling using a multiscale approach is presented. A dedicated dose-planning tool is currently under development to compare "virtual" minibeam plans with conventional ones and, consequently, to quantitatively investigate the potential for clinical translation.
resultsAll the facilities were dosimetrically characterized, demonstrating the capability of producing controlled and reproducible electron and proton minibeams. These beams exhibited diverse physical parameters, including peak-to-valley ratios between 3 and 30 at the entrance and center-to-center distances between 2 and 3 mm. The developed detectors, specifically scintillators and silicon detectors, successfully measured the minibeam patterns with sub-millimeter resolution, while large-area silicon carbide detectors were used for average dose measurements. First in-vitro biological investigations performed with low energy minibeams clearly showed an enhanced survival fraction in the 16HBE healthy lung cells, while maintaining iso-effective cell killing in A549 cancer cells. Furthermore, a synergy was observed when combining UHDR electron beams with minibeams.
conclusionsThe multidisciplinary approach was consolidated during these first 2 years of the MIRO project, as demonstrated by the results obtained both in terms of dosimetric characterization and biological investigations. The dedicated framework for modelling is being optimized to support the biological findings, allowing for a better interpretation of the results. The tool for dose planning, still under development, will allow the investigation of peculiar configurations to explore new frontiers in the perspective of future human trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.