Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42547862›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of emergency medicine2026

Four decades of tinnitus pathology research: a bibliometric analysis of scientific trends, collaborations, and research hotspots.

Selena M Shen, Rakin Haq, Latha Ganti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Selena M ShenPine View School, Sarasota, FL, USA.
Rakin HaqBrown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Latha GantiWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA. ganti@brown.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7717-3864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTinnitus is a debilitating auditory disorder affecting approximately 14% of adults worldwide, often co-occurring with hearing loss, sleep disturbance, anxiety and depression. Despite its high global prevalence and substantial socioeconomic burden, tinnitus research remains underfunded, and effective treatments are limited due to the condition's complex and heterogeneous pathophysiology. A comprehensive understanding of the research landscape in tinnitus pathology is essential for guiding future scientific and clinical efforts, including the evaluation of patients presenting with tinnitus in emergency and acute care settings.

methodsA bibliometric analysis was conducted on648 documents related to tinnitus pathology indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (1977-2025). The analytical tools VOSviewer, R-bibliometrix, and Microsoft Excel were used to assess publication trends, source journals, contributing countries and institutions, author networks, and thematic keyword evolution.

resultsFindings reveal a steady increase in both publication count and academic attention to tinnitus pathology, with even more rapid growth projected. The United States leads in publication volume and international collaboration, although countries like Finland and Switzerland demonstrate higher average citation impact. Authors Dirk de Ridder and James A. Henry were identified as key points of dissemination of academia. Keyword analysis revealed a historical shift from peripheral auditory models to central neurophysiological frameworks, with recent emphasis on intervention-focused topics. Thematic mapping identified "pathology," "prevalence," and "diagnosis as central yet underdeveloped areas requiring further academic investment.

conclusionThis bibliometric analysis contributes a comprehensive overview of the research landscape for tinnitus pathology. Current research focuses on translating our basic understanding of tinnitus into intervention. Despite recent advancements, critical knowledge gaps persist in tinnitus pathophysiology, diagnostic specificity, and prevalence metrics standardization. These findings have important implications for emergency medicine, where tinnitus may represent either a benign symptom or the manifestation of serious neurologic, vascular, or otologic disease requiring urgent evaluation.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID42547862
PMCPMC13430800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.