ArticleScientific reports2026
Performance Optimization of Novel Laser Hybrid Ultrasonic Vibration Assisted Micro Milling for Inconel 718.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Miniaturization drives advanced manufacturing essential for next-generation systems using superalloys in aerospace, biomedical and microelectronics. Hybrid machining combines distinct processes to harness their individual strengths and overcome limitations. This experimental research explored the machinability of Inconel 718 through novel laser hybrid ultrasonic vibration-assisted micro-milling (L-UVAMM), utilizing fiber laser for preparing slots followed by micro-milling on the corresponding laser-generated pilot slots with uncoated and three different coated tools. Cutting speed, feed, depth of cut, tool coatings and amplitude considered as input variables across four discrete levels to design experiments using Taguchi L-16 orthogonal array to investigate their effect on key responses including surface roughness, tool wear, and burr formation. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) identified the most significant parameters and determined the best input combinations. Uncoated tools displayed the least tool wear, TiSiN minimized burr height while TiAlN improved surface roughness and reduced burr width. ANOVA for the regression model revealed the tool type as the most crucial factor influencing responses with a contribution ratio of 45.76%. Response surface method optimized the regression model for optimum conditions, resulted in 43.96%, 27.18%, and 19.65% average reduction of surface roughness, tool wear, and burr formation, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.