Observational studyScientific reports2026
Global, multilingual, physician-invited, patient-completed digital registry enabling pre-consultation engagement and supporting more efficient care pathways in venous disease.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lower limb venous diseases are prevalent chronic conditions that require standardized, efficient, and patient-centered clinical assessment across diverse healthcare settings. Despite increasing digitalization of healthcare, scalable multilingual digital infrastructures capable of supporting standardized pre-consultation data collection and physician-validated real-world evidence generation remain limited. We conducted a global, cross-sectional observational study, using an innovative physician-invited/patient-completed digital registry, designed to enable pre-clinical engagement. The registry was conceived as a modular, multilingual digital infrastructure, allowing individuals to include clinical data prior to any physician encounter who will then validate the already acquired information, while also completing the healthcare professional part· We assessed geographic reach, usability, engagement in data completion, and cross-sectional associations between demographic, clinical factors and disease stage, defined as CEAP clinical class and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). 6457 patients from 59 countries from Africa, Asia, Europe, North and South America enrolled in the registry before their first specialist consultation. Completion of all the required data was achieved by 1355 patients from 12 countries. Among participating physicians, the platform usability was rated as easy in 94.2% of responses, while its overall usefulness was rated as high or very high in 76.6% of responses. Privacy concerns were expressed in 17% of cases. Cross-sectional analyses identified risk factor profiles associated with CEAP class ≥ 4 and VCSS ≥ 8·5. These stage-associated profiles differed from those previously reported, reflecting the need for a detailed integration of appropriately collected real-world data in venous disease investigations. A global, multilingual, physician-invited/patient-completed digital registry may facilitate earlier patient engagement and has the potential to support more efficient care pathway, moreover across linguistic contexts, with more timely data capture. This registry provides a scalable digital infrastructure for standardized patient- and physician-validated data collection across multiple countries, with potential applicability to multidisciplinary clinical practice and research. Such infrastructure may facilitate earlier and broader diagnostic insights, including for conditions beyond the initial reason for care seeking, and provide a robust foundation for machine learning, reducing reliance on synthetic datasets and supporting scalable, equitable digital health innovation across medical specialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.