ArticleScientific reports2026
Longitudinal predictors of vaccine conspiracy beliefs: findings from a five-wave panel study in Japan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 Pandemic not only posed a global health crisis but also intensified public divisions over vaccination, with conspiracy theories emerging as a significant obstacle to health communication. This study investigates the psychological and informational foundations of vaccine conspiracy beliefs using a five-wave longitudinal panel survey conducted annually in Japan between 2020 and 2024 (N=2,000 in 2020; N=600 in 2024). A factor analysis of an eight-item scale identified two distinct dimensions of conspiracy thinking: institutional conspiracy beliefs, which reflect distrust toward governments and pharmaceutical companies, and implausible conspiracy beliefs, which involve extreme claims such as microchip implantation. Latent growth modelling revealed that institutional conspiracy beliefs were associated with lower reliance on mass media, persistent and growing scepticism toward mainstream media, and younger age. These findings suggest that institutional conspiracy beliefs reflect enduring orientations of distrust rather than temporary reactions to pandemic-specific information. In contrast, implausible conspiracy beliefs were endorsed by only a small minority of respondents. This study makes three contributions. First, it demonstrates the need to distinguish institutional distrust-based conspiracies from fringe implausible narratives. Second, it provides longitudinal evidence clarifying how stable predispositions and changing attitudes jointly shape conspiracy beliefs. Third, it extends the literature by examining the Japanese context, adding cultural variation to a field dominated by Western-centric data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.