SynthesisInternal and emergency medicine2026
Effects of direct oral anticoagulants on cardiac outcomes in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF), but their effect on cardiac outcomes is less studied.
methodsSystematic review and network meta-analysis were performed on AF patients on DOACs/vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Both observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. Endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Rankograms and SUCRA were performed. Sub-group analysis included age (</≥ 75 years) and length of follow-up (</≥ 12 months).
results50 studies (3 RCTs, 4 post hoc analyses of RCTs and 43 observational studies) with 1,769,987 patients were included (59.9% on DOACs and 45.3% women). The MI risk (46 studies with 1,554,704 patients) was lower in all DOACs compared to VKA (apixaban: hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% credible interval [95%CI 0.72-0.96], edoxaban: HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.53-0.86, rivaroxaban: HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.74-0.95, dabigatran: HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.75-0.97). SUCRA showed edoxaban as first choice for preventing MI overall. In patients aged < 75 years, a lower MI risk was found for edoxaban (HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.41-0.85), while in those aged ≥ 75 years, no significant difference was found among anticoagulants. Heterogeneity was low in all analyses. Network meta-analysis showed no differences among DOACs. Compared to VKA, apixaban (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.63-0.97) was associated with lower MACE risk. Analysis of SUCRA showed apixaban as first choice for preventing MACE overall and in patients treated for < 12 months.
conclusionDOACs were associated with a lower risk of MACE/MI in AF. The effect of DOACs on cardiovascular risk differs according to aging and follow-up length. However, our findings are based on indirect evidence, and further studies are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023407778.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.