Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42547693›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2026

Duloxetine repositioning: Investigation of antifungal and antibiofilm activity against fluconazole-sensitive and resistant Candida Spp. strains.

Sarah Alves Barbosa, Dávylla Rênnia Saldanha Pinheiro, Leilson Carvalho de Oliveira, Lara Elloyse de Almeida Moreira, Vitória Pessoa de Farias Cabral, Daniel Sampaio Rodrigues, Beatriz Oliveira de Souza, Hélio Vitoriano Nobre Júnior, Livia Gurgel Do Amaral Valente Sa, Bruno Coêlho Cavalcanti and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sarah Alves BarbosaDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Faculty of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Bioprospecting of Antimicrobial Molecules (LABIMAN), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Dávylla Rênnia Saldanha PinheiroDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Faculty of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Bioprospecting of Antimicrobial Molecules (LABIMAN), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Leilson Carvalho de OliveiraDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Faculty of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Bioprospecting of Antimicrobial Molecules (LABIMAN), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Lara Elloyse de Almeida MoreiraDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Faculty of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Bioprospecting of Antimicrobial Molecules (LABIMAN), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Vitória Pessoa de Farias CabralDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Faculty of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Bioprospecting of Antimicrobial Molecules (LABIMAN), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Daniel Sampaio RodriguesDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Faculty of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Bioprospecting of Antimicrobial Molecules (LABIMAN), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Beatriz Oliveira de SouzaDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Faculty of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Bioprospecting of Antimicrobial Molecules (LABIMAN), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Hélio Vitoriano Nobre JúniorDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Livia Gurgel Do Amaral Valente SaDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Faculty of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Bioprospecting of Antimicrobial Molecules (LABIMAN), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Bruno Coêlho CavalcantiNucleus for Drug Research and Development (NPDM), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Islay Lima MagalhãesNucleus for Drug Research and Development (NPDM), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
José Roberto de Oliveira FerreiraSchool of Medical Sciences, State University of Health Sciences of Alagoas (UNCISAL), Maceió, AL, Brazil.
Manoel Odorico de MoraesNucleus for Drug Research and Development (NPDM), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
João Batista de Andrade NetoDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Faculty of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Bioprospecting of Antimicrobial Molecules (LABIMAN), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.
Cecília Rocha da SilvaDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Faculty of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Bioprospecting of Antimicrobial Molecules (LABIMAN), Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. labimanufc1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-351X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase in fungal infections, the limited therapeutic arsenal, and the emergence of resistance pose a global health problem. Candida spp. stand out as opportunistic pathogens that cause superficial and invasive diseases. Thus, the search for new therapeutic alternatives, such as drug repositioning, is necessary. Duloxetine (DUL), a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor antidepressant used to treat depression, has demonstrated antifungal activity and potentiates the effects of conventional antifungals in vitro. The objective of this study is to evaluate the in vitro activity of duloxetine (DUL) against resistant Candida spp. strains. To this end, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of DUL alone and in combination with conventional antifungals was determined in order to evaluate the type of interaction between them, as well as the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC). The activity of DUL against mature and developing biofilms was evaluated, in addition to the possible antifungal mechanism of action. DUL showed MICs of 16 to 128 µg/mL with a fungicidal action profile, and when combined there was synergistic interaction with amphotericin B (AMB). In biofilms, DUL exhibited antibiofilm activity and enhanced AMB activity against developing, but not mature, biofilms. Mechanism of action analysis showed that DUL promoted oxidative stress, evidenced by increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, reduced GSH levels, mitochondrial depolarization, and phosphatidylserine externalization, suggesting the activation of the apoptotic pathway as a possible mechanism of cell death. The pro-oxidant effects of DUL were evident in C. albicans strains deficient in antioxidant defenses (cap1Δ and gpx3Δ) compared to the wild-type strain. DUL exhibited antibiofilm activity and enhanced AMB activity against developing, but not mature, biofilms.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsBiofilmsCandidaDrug RepositioningDrug Resistance, FungalDuloxetine HydrochlorideFluconazoleAmphotericin BCandidiasisDrug SynergismHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReactive Oxygen SpeciesAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsDuloxetine HydrochlorideFluconazoleReactive Oxygen SpeciesBiofilmCandidaDrug repurposingDuloxetineResistance

Identifiers

PMID42547693
PMCPMC13433714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.