Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42547681›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

When visibility and priming have an inverse relationship: A successful replication of Vorberg et al., 2003.

Shanglin Yang, Jeffrey N Rouder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shanglin YangDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. shangly2@uci.edu.
Jeffrey N RouderDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.

Funding

Office of Naval Research N00014-23-1-2792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we replicate a striking dissociation of consciousness from action. The dissociation comes from Vorberg et al. (2003) who explored whether metacontrast-masked stimuli still prime subsequent actions. In metacontrast masking, stimuli are rendered less visible by increasing the time between it and a subsequent mask (ISI). Vorberg et al. demonstrated that as stimuli were less visible with longer ISI, they nonetheless exerted a greater priming effect on motor responses to subsequent targets. This stunning dissociation is highly persuasive, as it obviates the usual critiques of subliminal priming effects. To our knowledge, it remains unreplicated. Here we report a successful replication: in metacontrast masking, prime visibility decreases initially with ISI while motor priming increases. Our replication study has almost 5x as many individuals and provides confirming evidence for the dissociation. We provide an interpretation within Mishkin et al. (1983) ventral-and-dorsal stream processing model, and we show that individual differences in the effect are qualitative in that different individuals exhibit qualitatively different patterns.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessPerceptual MaskingPsychomotor PerformanceRepetition PrimingVisual PerceptionAdultHumansSubliminal StimulationIndividual differencesMetacontrast maskingMotor primingSubliminal priming

Identifiers

PMID42547681
PMCPMC13433410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.