Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42547679›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

A competency addition procedure for constructing minimal, yet maximally informative tests for skill assessment.

Pasquale Anselmi, Jürgen Heller, Luca Stefanutti, Egidio Robusto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pasquale AnselmiDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, Via Venezia 14, 35131, Padova, Italy. pasquale.anselmi@unipd.it.
Jürgen HellerDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstraße 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Luca StefanuttiDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, Via Venezia 14, 35131, Padova, Italy.
Egidio RobustoDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, Via Venezia 14, 35131, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competence-based test development is a novel method for constructing tests that are as informative as possible about the competence state (the set of skills an individual possesses) underlying item responses. If desired, the tests can also be minimal, meaning that no item can be removed without reducing their informativeness. Consider a set of competencies, each encompassing the skills required to solve a particular item. An individual masters an item if their competence state includes all the skills in the item's associated competency. A reduct is defined by a competency set that is as informative about individuals' competence states as a larger set, and from which no competency can be removed without reducing its informativeness. Test development can be based on the reduct, since including only one item for each competency in the reduct yields a test that is as informative as a test that contains additional items and is minimal with respect to this property. This work introduces the competency addition procedure, an iterative method that successively collects competencies until the resulting set forms a reduct. The competencies to be added can be selected either randomly or based on test developer preferences, thereby favoring competencies with more desirable characteristics. The procedure is illustrated in three real-life applications for the assessment of arithmetic skills, involving the construction of a test from scratch, the improvement of an existing test, and the shortening of an existing test.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementHumansCompetence modelCompetence structureProblem functionShort testsSkill assessmentTest construction

Identifiers

PMID42547679
PMCPMC13433462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.