ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
The influence of spatial frequencies, orientation, and familiarity on face stimuli integration.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When we observe an object, our visual system extracts both coarse and fine information to build a coherent percept. This process is often described as a coarse-to-fine integration, in which low spatial frequency (LSF) information provides an initial scaffold for interpreting high spatial frequency (HSF) detail. Here, we examined how this integration unfolds in face perception across two experiments. We leveraged the face inversion effect-where inverted faces are harder to recognize than upright ones-as a tool to probe processing flexibility. In Experiment 1, ten participants matched two familiar faces presented in rapid succession (template and probe), which were either spatial frequency-congruent (both LSF or both HSF) or incongruent (LSF-HSF or HSF-LSF). Accuracy was higher for HSF templates in congruent conditions, but in incongruent conditions, performance improved when matching LSF probes onto HSF templates-an effect limited to upright faces. In Experiment 2, twelve participants completed the same task with both familiar and unfamiliar faces. The pattern for familiar faces replicated that of Experiment 1; however, for unfamiliar faces, accuracy was generally higher in congruent conditions and was unaffected by template SF. These findings suggest that coarse-to-fine dynamics do not rigidly constrain spatial frequency integration in face recognition but instead reflect flexible processing strategies that adapt to stimulus familiarity, orientation, and task context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42547669What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.