SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
JAK inhibitor therapy in CANDLE syndrome: a systematic review of clinical outcomes in 46 patients.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature (CANDLE) syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive autoinflammatory disorder caused by mutations affecting proteasome function. Given the absence of standard therapy, we reviewed the therapeutic potential of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK-Is) in CANDLE syndrome. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched through September 2025. Eligible studies included patients with CANDLE or CANDLE-like disease treated with JAK-Is. Risk of bias was assessed using NHLBI and JBI tools, and findings were summarized descriptively. Sixteen articles including 46 patients were analyzed. The median age was 4.5 years, and all patients presented with skin rash. Common manifestations included fever (91.3%), lipodystrophy (73.9%), failure to thrive (56.5%), arthralgia/arthritis (43.4%), and panniculitis (39.1%). Multisystem involvement and elevated inflammatory markers were frequent. Corticosteroid use before JAK-I therapy was reported in 73.9% of patients. Baricitinib was the most commonly used JAK-I (73.9%), followed by tofacitinib (23.9%) and ruxolitinib (2.1%). Primary efficacy analysis in 26 patients of full-text publications showed complete response in 42.3%, significant response 11.5%, partial response in 38.5%, and no response in 7.6%. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infections and BK virus infection.
conclusionAvailable evidence suggests that JAK-Is may improve clinical and laboratory outcomes in patients with CANDLE syndrome, although these findings are based on a small number of patients and predominantly low-level evidence. Infections were the most commonly reported adverse events. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and establish the long-term efficacy and safety of JAK-Is in CANDLE syndrome. WHAT IS KNOWN: • CANDLE syndrome is a rare autoinflammatory disease with limited treatment options and significant multisystem morbidity. • JAK inhibitors have been increasingly used due to their role in interferon-mediated inflammation. WHAT IS NEW: • This systematic review summarizes outcomes of 46 reported CANDLE patients treated with JAK inhibitors. • Most patients showed clinical improvement, while infections were the most commonly reported adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42547647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.