Trial reportJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2026
Psychometric evaluation of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index among South African women participating in the Bukhali trial: Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative.
Trial report in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe examined the psychometric properties of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in a large sample of young women in Soweto, South Africa, to assess its reliability and structural validity in this context.
methodsData were collected from 7182 women enrolled in the Bukhali randomized controlled trial, part of the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative (HeLTI). Sociodemographic information and PSQI data were collected through interviewer-administered surveys. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega and item-level correlations. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the original one-factor and established two- and three-factor multidimensional models. Model fit was examined using Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI).
resultsMost women (57.4%) reported good sleep quality (PSQI ≤ 5). Poor sleep quality was associated with higher household socioeconomic status (assets score), higher education, and single relationship status. Average sleep was 7.8 hours, characterized by prolonged onset latency and high fragmentation, suggesting that continuity disruptions rather than opportunity shortage drove poor sleep. The PSQI had modest internal consistency (α = .57; ω = .57; item-total r = .33 - .65). The one-factor model demonstrated poor fit (χ
conclusionThe PSQI showed a multidimensional structure in this population. While both multidimensional models performed well, the two-factor model showed slightly better fit and is recommended for use in this population. Interpreting PSQI components rather than the global score offers more meaningful insight into sleep quality and highlights the need for context-specific psychometric validation in diverse settings. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE/STUDY RATIONALE: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is widely used, but prior evidence shows its reliability and factor structure vary across populations, settings, and sex. Young women in under-resourced urban South African settings may experience sleep disruption shaped by psychosocial stress, safety concerns, caregiving demands, and environmental factors, yet the PSQI had not been evaluated in this population. STUDY IMPACT: In this large Soweto cohort, sleep problems appeared driven more by fragmented sleep and continuity disruptions than by insufficient sleep opportunity. The PSQI performed better as a multidimensional measure, particularly a parsimonious two-factor structure, than as a single global score. The findings support using component- or factor-informed PSQI interpretation and highlight the need for context-specific validation of sleep measures in diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.