ReviewNature medicine2026
The next generation of antibody-drug conjugates.
Review in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)-composed of a monoclonal antibody linked to a payload-were designed to deliver high concentrations of cytotoxic agents to cancer cells. Since their inception, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of action and resistance to ADCs in patients has generated a wealth of advances in the chemistry of ADC constructs, together with rational therapeutic combinations. However, the pace of innovation now exceeds clinical trial capacity. Also, any single modification or combination is unlikely to generate clinically meaningful benefit on its own. In this context, there is a need to integrate multiple chemistry advances into individual ADCs and to develop frameworks, infrastructures and tools to accelerate and de-risk the preclinical and early clinical development of these agents. In addition, the development of multidimensional molecular tools to predict ADC sensitivity, together with the optimal use of new ADCs in early-stage cancers, should contribute to improved outcomes for patients. We discuss these opportunities and challenges and predict that in the longer term, the development of diversified ADC libraries incorporating distinct constructs and drug-to-antibody ratios will enable personalized treatment strategies aligned with individual tumor biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42547622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.